Faced with the escalation of the nuclear capabilities of opposing powers, the D.O.D. (Department of Defense) is conducting a substantial reassessment of its nuclear deterrence strategy. This adaptation is part of an international context marked by the diversification and modernization of nuclear arsenals. Contemporary challenges require careful consideration of how to maintain a strategic balance while ensuring national security and that of allies. The need to integrate capabilities, both nuclear than non-nuclear, appears to be an appropriate response to these new geopolitical realities.
THE Department of Defense (DOD) of the United States reconsiders its strategy of nuclear deterrent due to the rise of several nuclear adversaries. According to Richard C. Johnson, deputy assistant secretary of defense, this development is necessary to address the continued development of the nuclear arsenals of countries such as the China and the Russia. Potential revisions to Nuclear Posture Document 2022 aim to guarantee the effectiveness of deterrence, while integrating non-nuclear capabilities to support this mission. Report 491 proposes strategic changes in response to the increasing diversity and modernization of adversaries’ nuclear weapons, and highlights the need for enhanced coordination with allies to maintain broad deterrence commitments.
DOD Faces Growing Nuclear Threats
THE Department of Defense (DOD) of the United States faces a rapidly changing strategic environment, where several nuclear powers are strengthening and modernizing their arsenals. This situation prompts the DOD to reevaluate its strategy of nuclear deterrent. Countries like China and the Russia develop their capacity to carry out increasingly complex nuclear operations, which calls into question the logic of deterrence current.
During a recent panel hosted by the Center for Strategic and International Studies, Richard C. Johnson, deputy assistant secretary of defense, emphasized that DOD must adjust to this new reality. The diversification and expansion of adversaries’ nuclear arsenals requires a proactive response from the United States to maintain a strategic balance. Key decisions will need to be made to adapt the defense policy to changes in the geopolitical environment.
Necessary adaptations to the deterrence strategy
There nuclear posture review of 2022 may require adjustments given current dynamics. Growing concerns about evolving nuclear capabilities, particularly those of adversary nations, raise questions about the effectiveness of the traditional approach to deterrence. It is therefore envisaged to integrate non-nuclear capabilities to support the deterrence mission, while placing emphasis on escalation management.
Implications for global security
The evolution of nuclear strategy must not only focus on deterrence, but also consider crucial aspects such as non-proliferation and arms control. The complexity of the current global situation requires careful consideration of the role of deterrence in a broader context. DOD recognizes that complementary strategies will be necessary to effectively respond to future challenges, while meeting commitments to allies.
